4 ms·

Starting material, precursors, cost analysis, and a darknet market for sales. You can say they're not advocating or advising for anything, but they just did to

• soundwave106 10y ago
  That really isn't a worry in my opinion. Generally speaking, when a drug exists in prescription form, you don't see too many people rushing out to make it. (Methamphetamine's probably one of the few exceptions because it can relatively easily be (badly) made by "home chemists".) Instead, the focus becomes more on obtaining diverted prescription drugs via illicit channels ("doctor shopping", shady pharmacies, pharmacy theft, etc.). See: oxycodone, vicodin, etc. Beyond that, most of these compounds are patented or have been at one point, and there's certainly plenty of patents on fentanyl. Patents pretty much contain much of the information you need to make the compound, easy enough to look this information up. This is not very "top secret" information. Actually the poster provided hardly the information needed to actually make the compound in comparison to what you can Google. Finally, for those wishing to pursue this for some reason, said poster did not describe what to do when "the law" shows up at your door to inquire just what in the heck you are doing ordering acetic anhydride (it is, er, a U.S. DEA List II compound after all) or other watched chemicals. :) If someone's going to get into the illicit drug manufacturing business, they're going to need far more than a Hacker News post to do such.