4 ms·
I didn't go back to high school (you couldn't have made me if you wanted to), and whatever social learning attributed to it I think I made up with friends. This
by DaniFong 17y ago
I didn't go back to high school (you couldn't have made me if you wanted to), and whatever social learning attributed to it I think I made up with friends. This might not be the best transmission medium for our particular brand of culture (I am still told that I have to go to prom!), but I have a hard time believing that those who've grown up without school, either centuries ago or in other nations, were any less well adjusted or healthy. Learning from age peers is important, but I'm very glad I grew up with people of many ages and attitudes and intellects, away from the high school monoculture where age equals authority. The age of best friends now range from 21 to 55, and I am happier and wiser and stronger for it.
More important than age peers, I think, is shared experience with people from diverse backgrounds. Which seems to me to be precisely what he's trying to lobby for...
- thaumaturgy 17y agoI wholeheartedly agree with being exposed to people of different age groups and backgrounds, as often and as early as possible. When I was in the 3rd grade, I got to join an experimental "multi-graded" program which had students from the 1st through 5th grades in a single classroom. It's not that uncommon really, just sadly uncommon in U.S. public schools at the time. Anyway, it gave the older kids an opportunity to take leadership roles in group projects, and it gave the younger kids the opportunity to quickly learn behavior and skills from the older kids. It was a great, successful program, by most metrics.