5 ms·
I'm not complaining because I know that's forbidden, but how loosely is "anything that good hackers would find interesting" being interpreted these days? As be
by bostonpete 10y ago
I'm not complaining because I know that's forbidden, but how loosely is "anything that good hackers would find interesting" being interpreted these days?
As best as I can tell, nothing is off topic... (?)
- at-fates-hands 10y agoTotally agree. Not to mention the article is incredibly biased.
- frandroid 10y agoHow does "Many early hackers hackers did LSD" sound like?
- emmett 10y agoYou are exactly correct. Nothing is off-topic on Hacker News; the rule is "anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity", so that's a pretty wide mandate. I know you're saying you're not complaining, but you clearly are. Complaining things are off-topic isn't really helpful. I don't think the article is very good, but the problem isn't that LSD usage is somehow off-topic.
- oldmanjay 10y agoSince the community votes on the stories, it's being interpreted exactly as loosely as the community desires, moment to moment. For instance, in my opinion you nailed it exactly. Nothing is off topic.
- candu 10y ago"I'm not complaining oh wait yes I am see what I did there." More seriously: the many connections between computing and the psychedelic counterculture are well documented. (Markoff's "What the Dormouse Said" is an excellent read in this vein.) Discussions of disproportionate sentencing also strike a chord with "good hackers" who are aware of the history of CFAA sentencing, the Aaron Swartz debacle, and other terrible misadventures in our modern legal framework. If anything, this remark shows your deep ignorance of the broader cultural / political context of computing far more than it points to any inadequacy of the article in question.
- bostonpete 10y agoBullshit, it was a legitimate question. I don't make a habit of complaining about stories being off-topic and generally I could care less. But if there's a notion of on-vs-off-topic, I don't see the harm in clarifying it or discussing it within the community once in a while. You comment raised some interesting points -- I don't see why you had to throw in the insulting tone and phrasing.
- atomical 10y agoDon't be rude.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- Jach 10y agoA response I got to more or less the same: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11967634 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11967634 But I would argue drugs are way more on topic than politics. (See: other replies.) Plus it has far less chance of creating a toxic (even if civil by mod standards) discussion. As best I can tell, anything that's submitted and voted up and not flagged to hell (but sometimes mods override that) is on topic. Edit: and I just finished the article, it's not even bad. (Biased? I guess if you're expecting some drugs-are-bad-mkay disclaimer... it's just a short q&a.) This 70 year old seems incredibly up to date with technology and future implications.
- buckbova 10y agoFlag, hide, move on.
- jcoffland 10y agoInteresting how quickly this article was censored once it hit the front page.
- jmcgough 10y agoEarly hackers were very counter-culture. Modern ones still have an element of that.