I did not mean to imply that this paper was due extra skepticism in particular. Indeed, I tried to give the paper due praise for seeming to be more rigorous th

I did not mean to imply that this paper was due extra skepticism in particular. Indeed, I tried to give the paper due praise for seeming to be more rigorous than many other GWASs. And, yes indeed, false discovery rate has been a huge issue which the field has highlighted... that is my point. Caution has been warranted here historically, and it continues to be warranted even today.