I disagree. Again I say that the description is deliberately brief, to allow some latitude on the part of the implementer. > you are free to replace it with wh

I disagree. Again I say that the description is deliberately brief, to allow some latitude on the part of the implementer. > you are free to replace it with whatever you want No, with a pistol. You seem to be arguing that a "water pistol" is not a "pistol". I agree not all pistols are water pistols, it is also true that not all pistols are revolvers. If you choose to depict a pistol that is NOT a revolver, I think we would agree this still satisfies the standard. I think that a water pistol is a pistol, I think it is stretch to argue otherwise. > not very responsible behaviour That is a stretch.