4 ms·
Apple is rendering the gun symbol as a gun. That's very different from rendering the letter "a" as the letter "g", which are distinct symbols. Plus the fact th
by chriswarbo 10y ago
Apple is rendering the gun symbol as a gun. That's very different from rendering the letter "a" as the letter "g", which are distinct symbols.
Plus the fact that the only 'meaning' of characters like "a", "g", etc. is to represent themselves as distinguished from the other characters (which is taken to its logical conclusion in binary: each symbol represents itself as distinguished from the other one). Hence replacing an "a" with a "g" is to entirely replace the complete meaning of the symbol.
What Apple's done may, possibly, somewhat change some of the, already ambiguous, meaning of the gun symbol.
BTW, I wasn't trying to imply that Apple may be 'oppressed' by "the Man". I just don't want to see a future change to the Unicode standard mandating that particular symbols be rendered into particular arrangements of pixels, which I could certainly imagine the likes of Apple et al pushing for in order to work around their self-induced problems.
- RIMR 10y ago>Apple is rendering the gun symbol as a gun. That's very different from rendering the letter "a" as the letter "g", which are distinct symbols. It's actually referred to as "REVOLVER". If they replaced the car emoji with a helicopter, would you defend that since they represented a vehicle symbol with a vehicle? A water gun and a revolver are about as different as a sedan and a helicopter...