4 ms·

We also need reproducible build to finally cover most of debian ...

• leni536 10y ago
  https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/reproducible.html https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/reproducible.ht... Isn't >80% most of Debian?
  • ashitlerferad 10y ago
    80% is misleading, since there are still variations that are missing, like user shells, build paths and filesystems (disorderfs isn't used yet). https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/index_variations.html https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/index_variations.html
    • leni536 10y ago
      Sure, but variations are there so the reproducible builds are more robust and can be done natively. It doesn't mean that you can't reproduce these packages, just stick to the standard build paths, filesystems, etc... Also, I see that user login shell is varied.
• rbanffy 10y ago
  My font package is not. I am curious as to why would that be. Can you give me a hand with that? https://github.com/rbanffy/3270font https://github.com/rbanffy/3270font
  • ashitlerferad 10y ago
    See the comments on the reproducible builds website and ask on the #debian-reproducible IRC channel on OFTC if you need more info: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/3270font.html https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable...