Wouldn't a better culture fit be picking people who don't like to dogmatically promote their personal political beliefs, whichever side of the fence they're on?

Wouldn't a better culture fit be picking people who don't like to dogmatically promote their personal political beliefs, whichever side of the fence they're on? I've worked in groups where many members loved argueing and it was a positive thing. But also in groups where they hated it and it led to hostility. In neither case was political affiliation itself the problem.