3 ms·
There's nothing wrong with it, but often they are famous because of their personality, and have little actual skill, including needing auto-tune or even lip-syn
by ktRolster 10y ago
There's nothing wrong with it, but often they are famous because of their personality, and have little actual skill, including needing auto-tune or even lip-syncing performances.
The skill needed to be a rock-star is orthogonal to the skill needed to make beautiful music, and that is why those skills are worth considering separately.
- girvo 10y ago> but often they are famous because of their personality, and have little actual skill, including needing auto-tune or even lip-syncing performances. So, we're being haughty then. Because that's... painting in broad strokes, to say the least.
- ktRolster 10y ago>So, we're being haughty then Well good, you've reached the second level on the hierarchy of disagreement: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Graham%27s_Hierarchy_of_Disagreement.svg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Graham%27s_Hierarchy... Do you have something more substantial to say, or is that it?
- rimantas 10y agoFor some reason I associate autotune and lip-sync with pop music but not rock.
- ktRolster 10y agoIf you like rock and want to feel depressed, check out the current billboard top 10 in the rock category. The golden age of rock was definitely before the advent of auto-tune. (Though even the Beatles could have benefited from being more in tune). http://www.billboard.com/charts/rock-songs http://www.billboard.com/charts/rock-songs