3 ms·
It's not pedantic, he is directly questioning a core tenant of the article by using examples of where it may break down. It serves a rhetorical purpose.
by TrevorJ 10y ago
It's not pedantic, he is directly questioning a core tenant of the article by using examples of where it may break down. It serves a rhetorical purpose.
- sn9 10y agoWhat purpose? Does he honestly think the author literally believes the parts of the brain involved in locomotion can be used for programming? It's being pedantic in an unproductive way since no charitable reading of the OP would come away with that conclusion.