3 ms·
I consider your argument misinformed. Technology moves fast. Very fast. If a piece of tech gets old enough to be called a dinosaur, and is still run at brand-n
by qwertyuiop924 10y ago
I consider your argument misinformed.
Technology moves fast. Very fast. If a piece of tech gets old enough to be called a dinosaur, and is still run at brand-new companies, it's doing something right, even if it's not for your usecase.
And the fact is, not all of us have 3-5TB time seriesdatabases. And time series data can cause a lot of DBs to choke.
The point is, I'm glad Cassandra and Hbase, or a dedicated TSDB, or whatever, work for you. Your usecase is not the same as the rest of us, and assuming that it is is causing you to come to some incorrect conclusions.
- vegabook 10y agoClearly the relational databases are very good and very useful in more cases than time series. However timeseries is huge, and growing - it's not a niche case anymore. Anyhow my beef was with the assertion that the 4 relational databases listed were the "only serious ones". This is completely untrue.
- qwertyuiop924 10y agoYou may have missed the line "In that case" :-)
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]