4 ms·
In my opinion, replacing ads is worse than simply ad-blocking. Imagine a scenario where a replaced ad actually degraded the website's performance more so than
by DaemonHN 10y ago
In my opinion, replacing ads is worse than simply ad-blocking.
Imagine a scenario where a replaced ad actually degraded the website's performance more so than the website's own ads, which is not all that far-fetched, and users end up blaming the website for having crappy ads.
Additionally, what if Google and Mozilla started doing that with their browsers, would you still be okay with it?
- curioussavage 10y agoBrave has the incentive to want to make their browser the best way to see websites, as such its in their interest to make sure that doesn't happen. In any case its easy to turn off. In my experience any user who can't do that is the type that doesn't care either way.