4 ms·
Seems to be a problem with overload. But speaking of javascript, how many of the fingerprinting checks will not be possible if js is turned off? I could imagin
by elcapitan 10y ago
Seems to be a problem with overload.
But speaking of javascript, how many of the fingerprinting checks will not be possible if js is turned off? I could imagine that definitely all screen-related stuff is immediately killed.
- lewisl9029 10y agoApparently my CSS font list alone can uniquely identify my browser out of those tested so far, which is rather concerning... Is there some Firefox extension I can use to spoof my font list to some subset of my existing font list to conform with some widely used system default? I do have some custom fonts installed, but I'd prefer random websites I visit to not know about them if possible. Also, the way plugins are handled in Firefox has always bothered me quite a bit. I can disable them, but not remove them. What gives?
- Guillaume86 10y agoMy HTTP_ACCEPT Headers uniquely identify me, but I think anyone with an OS set to french using the last chrome version would have the same header, so it's really not a big sample (13 709 currently).
- Ntrails 10y agoBased on the number of websites which flat out collapse in the face of NoScript - being fingerprinted is probably not a problem. Of course, if you actually want to see the content you're probably boned unless the tracking gubbinz is hosted from elsewhere.