3 ms·
If this works, I think the technology is exactly what's needed for the tool to become incredibly popular... but the marketing is slightly off. The message is t
by comex 10y ago
If this works, I think the technology is exactly what's needed for the tool to become incredibly popular... but the marketing is slightly off.
The message is that the AI will do all the work for you, make all of the choices for you. But people like to design things! Not the precise work of arranging layouts, colors palettes, images, etc., probably, maybe not building things from scratch when they don't know the tricks needed to achieve that intangible feeling of professionalism - and certainly not the coding that most people have no idea how to do. But being involved at the last step, things like being given a choice of layouts and asked to render an aesthetic judgement on which is best, which needs no training* - in my experience, most people love that. It gives a sense of control, personalization, accomplishment. And on the flipside, the feeling that one has no control can be quite negative and frustrating.
But in many cases, choice is something an AI designer can offer as an advantage over traditional methods. After all, if you don't want to shell out the money for a professional custom design, you're typically stuck copying other people's templates with at most minor changes. In theory, an AI can let you make more meaningful permutations to the design to make it feel more personalized. Heck, I think even just the perception that a design is "from scratch" rather than "copied from someone else" would be valuable, even if your "AI" is dumb enough that in reality it amounts to the same thing.
If you do want to shell out the money, well, I don't expect a site builder to be able to compete with the results of that - but it's worth noting that you can spend as much time as you want nitpicking an AI design without worrying about wasting the designer's time.
I can't really tell from the video how many actual customization options the tool will have, but I think it should have as many as possible - all optional, of course, and probably most trivial - and be marketed like "anyone can design a website in a few clicks", not "we'll do it all for you".
*well, experience is probably required to actually pick the best one, but if all the choices are good then it doesn't matter much :)
- marc_firedrop 10y agoThat's actually spot on. I ran digital agencies for the past few years and it was always important that the client had some kind of input to the process, regardless of how good the design concept was. It's a simple pyschological need for a person to feel some kind of ownership and connection with their site, which is where I really feel The Grid has gone wrong because their designs are so far off what people want or are used to. We're updating the site in the coming days to demonstrate better how we involve the user, and presenting different layouts is actually one of the ways in which we do it. Firedrop is more of an A.I. web designer than a tool: you interact with it in a much more engaging and human way.
- panic 10y agoYeah, I think "collaborating with an AI designer" would be a compelling way to explain it! It's helping you design your site the way you want, not doing it for you.