>A man shouldn't feel obligated to be masculine, nor a provider, nor a protector, nor anything he doesn't want to be. Well, if a man doesn't want to provide fo

>A man shouldn't feel obligated to be masculine, nor a provider, nor a protector, nor anything he doesn't want to be. Well, if a man doesn't want to provide for his kids, then who should provide for his kids? Should a man force his wife to provide for his kids while he sits around doing nothing? Or should a man force the government to provide for his kids?