> the cantons with the highest levels of immigration voted the most strongly against the initiative. This appears to be the pattern most places, including Brit

> the cantons with the highest levels of immigration voted the most strongly against the initiative. This appears to be the pattern most places, including Brittain and the US. If this indicates that people learn to live with each other, then it's probably a good sign. The odd country out seems to be Sweden, where the "not much immigrated to" countryside seems to be more positive towards immigration than the urban areas. I'm still not quite sure why. Maybe they haven't been as good at distributing the immigration across the country?