> it's still hell of a predictor. I think I had already responded to that. The question is "on what level" and "what for". See my previous response. I wrote

> it's still hell of a predictor. I think I had already responded to that. The question is "on what level" and "what for". See my previous response. I wrote "If you only want to place "the best" on average, going for "IQ" is enough. If you want to match each one (individually, not by global average - in which case after hiring by IQ you just place them anywhere) to the appropriate job it isn't." It's the same as arguing for racial profiling because "it works". Well it does! If you don't care about people (individuals) but only about peoples.