> this literal interpretation of the statute's wording is eschewed in favor of a more restrictive interpretation I have no idea what you are talking about. Wha

> this literal interpretation of the statute's wording is eschewed in favor of a more restrictive interpretation I have no idea what you are talking about. What's more or less restrictive, can you explain? > this example is actually mentioned in the legal literature. I have no idea what legal literature you are talking about.