2 ms·
Certainly eminent domain is sometimes necessary, and I agree some form of it will probably be necessary to solve California's problem, but I wouldn't exactly as
by sbov 10y ago
Certainly eminent domain is sometimes necessary, and I agree some form of it will probably be necessary to solve California's problem, but I wouldn't exactly associate it with "letting prices rise" (the statement by the poster who started this line of thought).
The free market had its say when these water rights were sold, taking it back from them with eminent domain so we can charge more is not the free market.
- dpark 10y agoWeren't these water rights sold a hundred years ago when the aggressive agriculture and population didn't exist?