This is valuable code and should be released, but the product's naming and one-line about already betray it's intended purpose (as the author envisions), provid

This is valuable code and should be released, but the product's naming and one-line about already betray it's intended purpose (as the author envisions), providing an additional vector of criticism. In cases like this, I feel erring on the side of being less explicit tends to help. Leave just enough out to let everyone read between the lines, and put the pieces together. Don't say it's a "Machine learning algorithm to connect anonymous accounts to real names", say it's a 'speech pattern analyzer', or say it 'allows comparison of speech patterns for likelihood of same author'.