3 ms·
I skipped over SVN on my way to Git from CVS, but I've heard the handling of branches in SVN isn't much better than CVS, and there it is absolutely horrible. S
by e40 17y ago
I skipped over SVN on my way to Git from CVS, but I've heard the handling of branches in SVN isn't much better than CVS, and there it is absolutely horrible.
So, if you don't use branches it is understandable why you are happy with SVN. If you want branches, you'll need Git something like it (HG).
- neilc 17y agoBranches work just fine in SVN. Merging isn't great, but it is much better with merge tracking in recent versions of SVN.
- iskander 17y agoYep, we don't use branches. Maybe that's the reason everyone seems to have such (otherwise mystifyingly) negative opinions of SVN.
- rbonvall 17y agoFor me it was the other way around. Using git made me want to use branches.