3 ms·
Yup. The same is roughly true for being object-oriented. The big paradigm divisions were largely a thing of the 1990s; since then languages have become increas
by bunderbunder 10y ago
Yup. The same is roughly true for being object-oriented.
The big paradigm divisions were largely a thing of the 1990s; since then languages have become increasingly multiparadigm, so that it's almost hard to find a language that isn't nowadays. I think Haskell and Golang might be just about the last remaining standard-bearers of the league of one-trick ponies.