7 ms·
I read the article carefully, and was unable to find where it says what you say it says. In particular, you're making super-strong statements like "be all and
by greglindahl 10y ago
I read the article carefully, and was unable to find where it says what you say it says.
In particular, you're making super-strong statements like "be all and end all of what defines 'science'" -- that's not what I see in the article. The article is reasonably pointing out that we have a repetition crisis and that more emphasis should be placed on it. That's not the various super-strong things you're claiming you see in it.
- euyyn 10y agoThe very title claims that unrepeated results shouldn't be accepted.
- sn9 10y agoThe contents of the article are the only thing that ever matters. The title is picked by editors to get the most people to click on it.
- ycombinatorMan 10y agoI think the title is all that matters. I'm only here for the discussion, and the title defines the topic.
- oldmanjay 10y agoYour approach will lead you to having an incorrect take quite often. You should reconsider unless you enjoy being wrong for no particular reason.
- ycombinatorMan 10y agoWell it hasnt, and Ive had this "approach" for years.
- sn9 10y agoThat's like going to a book club without having read the book. You miss all nuance. It's becomes very quickly apparent to those who've read the article when others comment without having read beyond the title.
- ycombinatorMan 10y agoYoure wrong
- UlyssesSKrunk 10y agoSee? There you go again. Man, trolls here are way less funny than on reddit.
- ycombinatorMan 10y agoNot a troll
- oldmanjay 10y agoAre you under the impression you aren't wrong here?
- OOPMan 10y agoThis is why I don't participate in HN discussions. The level of vapidness is mind boggling.
- euyyn 10y agoIf the title is click-bait that doesn't match the content, it should be corrected when submitting it on HN.
- awarer 10y ago2nd paragraph.