3 ms·
I believe you may have misunderstood the point. The author of the post suggests that why and when remain the same - to show the flag for deterrence, or to cont
by L_Rahman 10y ago
I believe you may have misunderstood the point.
The author of the post suggests that why and when remain the same - to show the flag for deterrence, or to control part of the sea to protect shipping, or to protect a Marine amphibious force, or to project offensive power against any adversary in well-defended areas.
Today, the way we do this carrier strike groups. The author is arguing that the carrier strike model for achieving these goals is now ~50 years old. If you were to start today from a blank slate to achieve those goals, you'd construct something very different from a strike force. This is where he's suggesting mavericky thinking ought to be applied - in coming up with those blank slate solutions.