3 ms·
> there is no way to pollute the air (or ocean) without depriving others of their rights I mostly agree with this part, > If you are a True Libertarian you sh
by ancap 10y ago
> there is no way to pollute the air (or ocean) without depriving others of their rights
I mostly agree with this part,
> If you are a True Libertarian you should be in favor of the Government regulating air polluters
but take issue with this part.
As others have pointed out the libertarian position on air pollution, and similarly on other kinds of pollution, is it is a tortious trespass on property and is dealt with through the judicial system. Meaning no regulation or action is needed by government other than the recognition of property rights. This was the position of common law and was abandoned by American courts in the early 20th century.
Now, when you refer to the oceans, which due to government action remain un-ownable, it's more complicated and the libertarian position is that they should be privatized.
- throwaway2016a 10y agoOk, good point. I should have probably said protected by the government not regulated. But with that said, regulation is more efficient than going after every polluter on a case by case basis. Legislation can at least be used to set the guidelines so everyone knows what rules they are playing by. Either that or you're just replacing law with case-law which would have relatively the same effect. A rose by any other name...