So we agree then? Models in natural since need to be cross verified by multiple findings using various methodologies. Each model and method adding to the evid

So we agree then? Models in natural since need to be cross verified by multiple findings using various methodologies. Each model and method adding to the evidence of our understanding and the probability that we got it right. In this case, the new methodology refutes the prior one. So, instead of adding the evidence that current models are right, this creates a new hypothesis, for which currently only this one model seems to agree with. So, I get what you're saying about there will never be an absolute truth, but I hope you get what I'm saying about how this one finding alone means little in terms of being conclusive.