It's illogical from a rational, maximum-utility-for-all perspective. However, looking at it from the point of view of a primate status hierarchy competition, i

It's illogical from a rational, maximum-utility-for-all perspective. However, looking at it from the point of view of a primate status hierarchy competition, it makes perfect sense. The apex individuals derive pleasure from subjugating their lower status colleagues, and thus seek to make their lives as miserable as possible. From this point of view, all of human history makes sense. We are but primates, and no amount of highbrow pontificating can change that. Starting today, if the powerful wanted to, they could design a rational system that maximizes happiness and minimizes suffering for the largest number of people possible. But then, there is no incentive in the primate brain to foster such an endeavor. Even philanthropists, instead of uniting and agreeing on a shared vision, compete with each other for status amongst themselves by virtue signalling their own superiority over their peers. It is nature red in tooth and claw. We are no exception.