>But there's a difference between censors who block the service or attempt to discredit it with lies, and people who support Wikileaks' goals but point out its

>But there's a difference between censors who block the service or attempt to discredit it with lies, and people who support Wikileaks' goals but point out its errors. I think that the title of the article pretty clearly falls into the "discredit it with lies" category Edit: To clarify, the leaked emails are not "public mailing list archives". There's just lots of spam because it's, you know, email.