We’d all agree that to teach a subject, you must know the subject. So you’d think that experts would be the best teachers, No I wouldn't. Why would anyone thi

We’d all agree that to teach a subject, you must know the subject. So you’d think that experts would be the best teachers, No I wouldn't. Why would anyone think that? This article is built on a foundation of affirming the consequent. (Sorta, there are enough fuzzy words to weasel around making a logical assertion, but it boils down to "if there's a lot of Q, then in that case surely there must be a lot of P") If someone is going to write such bollocks, not only do I not trust their article, I stopped reading because I fear it will only make me stupider.