4 ms·
I don't understand why this article doesn't mention how much these women were eating. From my understanding, the number of calories eaten is just as large of a
by char 17y ago
I don't understand why this article doesn't mention how much these women were eating. From my understanding, the number of calories eaten is just as large of a factor in weight regulation (if not more) as exercise.
- mawhidby 17y agoThe main thing is if calories eaten == calories burned, then you should maintain a stable weight. Exercise helps in this equation because it raises your metabolism (as well as other benefits), which in turn burns more calories.
- char 17y agoThis is correct. But my point is that while exercise is a contributor, it isn't the only factor in weight loss. So for this article to conclude that people need to exercise for an hour a day in order to avoid weight gain without mentioning how much they were eating seems very incomplete.
- aaronblohowiak 17y agoThere is an additional subtlety that may interest hackers. It is actually if calories metabolized by the body == calories burned. Calories are mostly fungible, but they are processed differently (by the liver or by the cells themselves, for instance) and this has drastic effects on metabolic health. For instance, fructose is processed by the liver and does not trigger the satiety hormones as easily as glucose. So, while the total amount of energy available is the same for calorically similar amounts of fructose and glucose, the impact on fat storage and hunger is different. For more about the biochemistry of metabolism see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBnniua6-oM http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBnniua6-oM