3 ms·
Strategic reasons for choosing different licensing models exist. The Free Software Foundation itself reccommends using different licensing models for software l
by erlehmann_ 10y ago
Strategic reasons for choosing different licensing models exist. The Free Software Foundation itself reccommends using different licensing models for software libraries depending on the situation:
• No copyleft for libraries that implement proprietary standards competing with open standards, to further adoption of the implemented standard among proprietary software developers.
• Weak copyleft for libraries that implement the same features as existing proprietary software, to further adoption of the library among proprietary software developers.
• Strong copyleft for libraries that “do not face entrenched noncopylefted or nonfree competition”.
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-recommendations.en.html https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-recommendations.en.html
- saosebastiao 10y ago> No copyleft for libraries that implement proprietary standards competing with open standards, Shouldn't that be the other way around?
- erlehmann_ 10y agoYes.
- the_why_of_y 10y agoYour first point is summarized the wrong way, it is "No copyleft for libraries that implement open standards competing with proprietary standards".
- erlehmann_ 10y agoIndeed. Sorry!