5 ms·
No, git would have to be a package in the same package manager, as a build dependency. Think OS package manager, but limited to what developer needs, i.e. just
by zzzcpan 10y ago
No, git would have to be a package in the same package manager, as a build dependency. Think OS package manager, but limited to what developer needs, i.e. just software, no services, no superuser privileges, etc.
- Vendan 10y agoTalk about feature creep! It sounds like you want a package manager and ecosystem that can install half an OS, just so you don't have to fuss with installing git on your own...
- zzzcpan 10y agoIt's going to be "half an OS" either way. But it can be nice and reliable, if you go the nix road.
- stijlist 10y agoMore specifically, there is already a package manager and ecosystem that can install all of an OS, and you don't have to fuss with installing anything on your own. This package manager and ecosystem could subsume the problem of language-specific package managers entirely.
- Vendan 10y agoWhat manager? Can it run on Windows? Linux? Mac? If it can't do all 3, it's already failed the first requirement...