3 ms·
No, GP got it right. The quoted part is that instead of VirtualBox one can use Hyper-V. In either case, it's handled by docker-machine which runs a GNU/Linux V
by drdaeman 10y ago
No, GP got it right.
The quoted part is that instead of VirtualBox one can use Hyper-V. In either case, it's handled by docker-machine which runs a GNU/Linux VM with Docker (host) tools installed, and containers are ran on that VM.
I would be surprised if there aren't plans to support WSL (to run Linux-targetting binaries on Windows "natively", thus have "native" Docker containers) but don't think that's available yet.