> So if you eat a vegetarian meal at a restaurant at $40, that is worse for the environment than eating $10 worth of meat at home. This is just so completely f

> So if you eat a vegetarian meal at a restaurant at $40, that is worse for the environment than eating $10 worth of meat at home. This is just so completely false and what you are really doing is trying to simplify it too much. Sure if the vegetarian meal was grown where there used to be a rain forest, flown across the world and driven in trucks then maybe it would be worse for the environment than a small local farm that don't have a lot of animals would. But that is _never_ the case and to get that $10 meat the meat have to eat a lot more than my vegetarian meal. Everything is of course depending on the conditions, but there is no need for any denial on how bad meat production is for the environment. It is unsustainable for the humans to eat as much meat as we do today.