6 ms·
IKEA are pretty hot on punishing transgressors. But yes, you're right, greenwashing is always a danger. Slavery is a good place to start, it is claimed that t
by SixSigma 10y ago
IKEA are pretty hot on punishing transgressors.
But yes, you're right, greenwashing is always a danger.
Slavery is a good place to start, it is claimed that there are more slaves in the world now than every in human history, for example see - ‘Sea Slaves’: The Human Misery That Feeds Pets and Livestock [1]
In 2015 the UK passed the Modern Slavery Act [2] which gave the biggest companies (turnover £36m+) a legal responsibility and sets out a set of punishments and reparations if they fail to address slavery in their supply chains.
The Supply Chain managers of the future are having CSR drilled into them now as part of their education (I know, I'm part of it). We must hope they are not crushed by the wheels of the corporate machines.
[1] http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/27/world/outlaw-ocean-thailand-fishing-sea-slaves-pets.html http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/27/world/outlaw-ocean-thailan...
[2] http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2014-15/modernslavery.html http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2014-15/modernslavery.ht...
- zaroth 10y agoThanks for the pointers! I was really optimistic following the link, but reading more... The draft bill included no measures to counter the use of slave labour abroad as the Home Office believed that asking businesses to audit and report on modern slavery in their supply chains would be an “additional burden”. However, campaigning resulted in a supply chain clause being added to the bills so that “big business will be forced to make public its efforts to stop the use of slave labour by its suppliers”. And further... There are, however, no legally binding requirements to conduct due diligence on supply chains and there are no criminal or financial penalties for non-compliance. So, again, I ask the universe... why the fuck not?!
- SixSigma 10y agoThe coalition of the unwilling