5 ms·

Neat. So does it have SUPDUP support? ;)

• vacri 10y ago
  I presume the linked article is the Sup Doc.
  • qwertyuiop924 10y ago
    ??? Um, what does that have to do with SUPDUP?
    • vacri 10y ago
      Are you asking... what's Sup Doc? ;)
      • qwertyuiop924 10y ago
        No, because it supported SSHas a protocol, I jokingly asked if it supported the SUPDUP protocol. I have no idea what you're talking about.
        • vacri 10y ago
          http://www.polyvore.com/cgi/img-thing?.out=jpg&size=l&tid=10378079 http://www.polyvore.com/cgi/img-thing?.out=jpg&size=l&tid=10... http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=up%20dog http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=up%20dog :)
          • qwertyuiop924 10y ago
            You're referencing bugs bunny, yes, but it's not FUNNY to just splice in the punchline if nobody ASKED. It just leaves everybody confused.
            • vacri 10y ago
              I, vacri, formally apologise to you, qwertyuiop924, for attempting a moment of levity.
              • qwertyuiop924 10y ago
                Hey don't appologize for attempting a moment of levity. Just because it didn't work doesn't mean it wasn't a good idea.
• VojtechVitek 10y ago
  Sup doesn't support SUPDUP. It uses SSH in RAW or TTY mode. I think I should reconsider :)
  • qwertyuiop924 10y ago
    Well, if it was ever rewritten to support multiple transports, and it DID support SUPDUP, it would instantly become the most popular deployment and system management tool on systems that run supdup :). But even supporting those systems may require quite a bit of work...
    • VojtechVitek 10y ago
      I'm convinced now :)