4 ms·
He is a gay conservative men's rights activist. He has a good time and is hilarious, but his primary purpose is certainly not trolling. What do you think he di
by CptJamesCook 10y ago
He is a gay conservative men's rights activist. He has a good time and is hilarious, but his primary purpose is certainly not trolling.
What do you think he did that deserved a ban?
Here is a 3 hour talk with Milo in which he brilliantly discusses and debate a huge range of issues: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGL5eRw7rXU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGL5eRw7rXU
This is not someone who deserves to be censored by Jack Dorsey.
- k-mcgrady 10y agoAfter he was banned I watched several hours of his interviews with, I think, Ruben Report. The only important takeaway relating to the Twitter ban I got was that he enjoys and actively pursues riling people up in an attempt to make his point. I will admit I even agreed with him on a few things (certainly not everything) but that doesn't matter. He was fostering a toxic atmosphere on Twitter and if the loss of a mainstream celebrity would have a bigger effect on their user numbers than the loss of him they made the right decision.