2 ms·
From other sources, she licensed them for free use with attribution, she didn't abandon the copyright.
by Natsu 10y ago
From other sources, she licensed them for free use with attribution, she didn't abandon the copyright.
- dperfect 10y agoIf that's true, then either the Library of Congress didn't get the memo (they very clearly specify that it's in the public domain), or this is somehow a case where "public domain" means something different from the standard definition.
- Natsu 10y agoIt's possible they mislabeled it, but one would think they were still on the hook if they sent any DMCA notices, as they should not have any reason to believe that they were the copyright holders or in any way authorized to sue for "infringement" of the works... particularly when sending notices to the actual copyright holder.