4 ms·
> I hope at least Guile Emacs will try getting rid of it. Guile Emacs is dead, isn't it? No activity in over a year: http://git.hcoop.net/?p=bpt/emacs.git http
by CyberShadow 10y ago
> I hope at least Guile Emacs will try getting rid of it.
Guile Emacs is dead, isn't it? No activity in over a year: http://git.hcoop.net/?p=bpt/emacs.git http://git.hcoop.net/?p=bpt/emacs.git
- mintplant 10y agoThis article is more than a year old. > 28/02/2015
- AceJohnny2 10y agoBy Emacs standards, it's not dead, it's just sleeping. In fact, it thinks it'll go for a walk...
- jpfr 10y ago> Guile Emacs is dead, isn't it? Emacs-guile is working today. That's a first after many many years of talk and proof-of-concept stage efforts. I hope the development will pick up speed once guile 2.2 and emacs 25.1 are out. Both projects underwent some big changes/improvements lately. One sign of live is that bpt's improvements to guile elisp were rebased on a recentish guile-master. This branch lives in the main repository now. http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/log/?h=wip-elisp http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/log/?h=wip-elisp Also, I have seen some recent commits from emacs developers to guile. So the two projects are talking to each other. Now, imho, the success if emacs-guile strongly depends on whether they manage to share the load across several developers. A more open development culture surely would help.