4 ms·
Exactly what I was thinking, if it's easy to tell they've been intercepted by a third party that infers it's possible to do it so what's to stop a DOS attack ma
by OldSchoolJohnny 10y ago
Exactly what I was thinking, if it's easy to tell they've been intercepted by a third party that infers it's possible to do it so what's to stop a DOS attack making it useless?
- parineum 10y agoRight. The only difference between that and what we have now is the ability to detect tampering.
- jcoffland 10y ago> if it's easy to tell they've been intercepted by a third party that infers it's possible to do it so This is a logical fallacy. Furthermore, it says nothing about how difficult a DOS attack would be to perform.