4 ms·
That should only be temporary. Assuming there's competition (and it seems that there is - no university has a monopoly), the influx of money allows the industry
by fragsworth 10y ago
That should only be temporary. Assuming there's competition (and it seems that there is - no university has a monopoly), the influx of money allows the industry to grow. The prices should level out over time.
- zekevermillion 10y agoOne would think that is true, that tuition is seeking a new equilibrium based on: subsidized lending; lack of bankruptcy protection from student loans; desire of high school grads to enroll in university. However, we do not seem to have reached a tuition plateau yet. Further, the expensive tastes of both public and private institutions, and the leverage undertaken by students, means that this system overall is fragile. If there is a rapid change in economic circumstances, we will find that overlevered students (including those that we thought had "reasonable" debt loads) and high-cost institutions will fail at an alarming rate. Endowments will shrink overnight. States will slash funding for state universities / research. Tuition will not possibly be able to come down fast enough, in those circumstances. Until then -- business as usual!
- unprepare 10y agoonly if cost is something they compete on. as it is, the most expensive universities are seen as better, more prestigious.