4 ms·
You don't need a standard library to win if you don't have any competitors (in the browser). :) Fitness for purpose is relative to the other options.
by tibbe 10y ago
You don't need a standard library to win if you don't have any competitors (in the browser). :)
Fitness for purpose is relative to the other options.
- saghm 10y agoWell, JS was originally competing with Java applets in the browser, but, like you said, fitness for purpose is pretty significant! My point (or rather, the point of the parent comment that I'm agreeing with) there's a lot more than just the presence and characteristics of a standard library that determine how widespread a language becomes
- Touche 10y agoThat's overly dismissive, Node.js has the same issue as JS in the browser and does very well. Small core doesn't matter there.