3 ms·
That's not true, and it's happened before: http://www.cnet.com/news/nessus-security-tool-closes-its-source/ http://www.cnet.com/news/nessus-security-tool-close
by castratikron 10y ago
That's not true, and it's happened before:
http://www.cnet.com/news/nessus-security-tool-closes-its-source/ http://www.cnet.com/news/nessus-security-tool-closes-its-sou...
A project like Linux couldn't do this, since it has thousands of authors, and each author would have to agree to the change. But if the author is a single person, or a corporation, then only one person has to make the decision.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- KirinDave 10y agoYou're misreading the article, I think. They didn't release a new version under the GPL. They didn't retroactively undo licensing for older versions. It is not at all clear that you can snap your fingers and renegotiate an existing license arbitrarily like that. You need to do it in advance of the agreement.