3 ms·
AMP versions of articles are developed by publishers, not by Google, so it's there thanks to WSJ. As for the paywall, the AMP access component[1] is not stable,
by __derek__ 10y ago
AMP versions of articles are developed by publishers, not by Google, so it's there thanks to WSJ. As for the paywall, the AMP access component[1] is not stable, so WSJ's options were basically to skip AMP (and the associated traffic) or to skip the paywall.
[1]: https://github.com/ampproject/amphtml/blob/master/extensions/amp-access/amp-access.md https://github.com/ampproject/amphtml/blob/master/extensions...
- kuschku 10y agoAMP Access is funny anyway, as it just sets a display: none on the content. There're already extensions circumventing it.
- nostromo 10y agoI see the paywall on WSJ's AMP: http://imgur.com/tg7PqBu http://imgur.com/tg7PqBu Got this from this page: https://www.google.com/amp/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/facebook-posts-strong-profit-and-revenue-growth-1469650289 https://www.google.com/amp/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/facebook... (You can't view it from desktop as they're doing browser detection and forward you to the WSJ page.)
- __derek__ 10y agoOh, good catch. I'm incorrect, and they are using the component.[1] I suppose they just have the same policy for the carousel as for Google News. [1]: http://i.imgur.com/Jlu6JRX.png http://i.imgur.com/Jlu6JRX.png