4 ms·
The original Digg entry specifically makes the entire point that Digg is willing to sacrifice write performance to improve read performance (which they did to a
by gill_bates 17y ago
The original Digg entry specifically makes the entire point that Digg is willing to sacrifice write performance to improve read performance (which they did to a massive degree with Cassandra), and then demonstrated how absolutely horrendous their read performance was.
Need more be said? Seriously?
- skorgu 17y agoCassandra is hugely biased towards making writes fast [1] and there's no indication in either Digg article that they (somehow) changed that fact in their deployment by tuning. Digg loads the complexity during the write by denormalizing but that load is on the application server not the data store. [1] http://spyced.blogspot.com/2010/01/cassandra-05.html http://spyced.blogspot.com/2010/01/cassandra-05.html