4 ms·
OK, since this got voted up 7 times, it seems I'm being dense. Can somebody shed some light on where I'm missing something? On the one hand, an employee asks i
by CWuestefeld 17y ago
OK, since this got voted up 7 times, it seems I'm being dense. Can somebody shed some light on where I'm missing something?
On the one hand, an employee asks if it's OK to take 2 weeks to go to her brother's wedding in India. I say "sure, no problem".
And on the other hand, I'm getting pressure from the CEO for some new features, and obviously losing one of 9 developers for 2 weeks impacts that, so I have to tell the CEO that's she's got to wait a little longer.
Where am I getting things wrong, or being self-righteous or something?
- Tichy 17y agoI can only speak for myself, but I find it a little bit difficult to understand your point. You might as well "complain" (I know you are not complaining, just stating facts) that employees need 8 hours of sleep, so you have to tell the CEO that they can't work 20 hours per day on the new feature. Or that humans can't multitask and work on two projects at the same time (imagine that, you could get twice as much work done with the same personnel). Humans have needs, so you have to take them into account. So "it makes it hard" sounds weird - it just is what it is, it is not being made hard. You are not losing a developer for 2 weeks, you never had that developer for those two weeks to begin with. Just as you don't have a developer who can work on two projects at the same time. Perhaps employing more people might be an option?
- phugoid 17y agoYou sound like a sadly stereotypical manager who cares more about making everything look peachy to his superior than about making the workplace tolerable for his subordinates. Your job is to get the best performance from your reports, and to shelter them from the often unrealistic demands of upper management while they get on with their work unhindered. One such unrealistic demand is that people only take vacations when it's convenient.