3 ms·
Why not, its a private site, freedom of speech does not pertain to Facebook.
by ProAm 10y ago
Why not, its a private site, freedom of speech does not pertain to Facebook.
- gruez 10y agoRight, legally it's okay for facebook to censor stuff. But ethically/morally, some people do not think that's the case because they feel they're abusing their large marketshare.
- amyjess 10y agoMorally, they have the right to decide who they want to associate with.
- ProAm 10y agoEthics and morals with Facebook? They have a long troubled history of dealing with both. It's a company, and companies want to make money, that's the bottom line. Of course it's censored in their best interests.
- gshulegaard 10y agoWell the obvious example is conflict of interest cases. Take the hypothetical situation where someone writes a negative exposé on Facebook privacy policies and then plugs a competitor. Suppose in this contrived example that Facebook systematically removes all related content to this exposé and bans the creator. On one hand Facebook is a private company. On the other they are built around a communication platform and communication is a constitutionally protect right in America. Moreover, this type of practice could be considered anti-competitive and subject to anti-trust regulation (a bit unusual, but there is precedent). I am not trying to advocate one or another view on this issue...more of trying to frame what I think is an interesting question: Where is the line where private rights give way to public rights...if at all?