It's not easy to see how the article could "compare modern progressive SJW viewpoints" because it was written in 1995, before that derisive term was invented.

It's not easy to see how the article could "compare modern progressive SJW viewpoints" because it was written in 1995, before that derisive term was invented. But yes, it is quite possible that discussion here will be tired sloganeering. To keep that from happening, we have to engage with the piece itself.