3 ms·
App.net briefly tried to be a paid-for Twitter clone. I guess they've sort of pivoted from that model but it was an interesting idea at the time. And obviously
by fusiongyro 10y ago
App.net briefly tried to be a paid-for Twitter clone. I guess they've sort of pivoted from that model but it was an interesting idea at the time. And obviously it didn't work, because free is cheaper than non-free.
- devishard 10y agoYeah. But even if they both charged the same amount of money, I think they'd just both go out of business, because nobody is going to pay for what either has to offer.
- fusiongyro 10y agoI want to disagree with you, but I paid for app.net and then didn't use it... so I guess I can't.