5 ms·
Wait, missing one mention equates to not reading the entire article? Amazing indeed.
by jjnoakes 10y ago
Wait, missing one mention equates to not reading the entire article? Amazing indeed.
- nardi 10y ago"Milo" appears nine times in the article. The discussion about him is a large part of the content.
- jsmthrowaway 10y agoTo be fair, the points about that person were almost near the end after heavy points about the product, it "felt" like conclusion territory which I often skip if I've gotten the point already, and to be honest, I about ran out of steam by that point too. Is it so crazy to imagine that someone reads an article that makes its point quite clearly even before the conclusion, and comments upon it after reading solely its meat? Hell, I almost closed the article once I saw that person's name, even. A lot of people here just are snapping to criticize over this, which is oddly reminiscent of a subtext of the article, not doing this comment section any favors, and specifically discussed in the HN guidelines. Now that I've made a substantive comment: who cares, seriously?
- forloop 10y ago> Wait, missing one mention equates to not reading the entire article? Amazing indeed. See nardi's comment. Amazing indeed!